Peter Sheahan is founder and CEO of ChangeLabs™, a global consultancy delivering large-scale behavioral change projects for clients such as Apple and IBM, Peter Sheahan has worked with some of the world’s leading brands in the area of innovation and change.
He joined us to talk about his latest, maybe greatest, book: Making It Happen: Turning Good Ideas into Great Results.
You can listen at this link.
Peter, thanks for being on the show!
No worries Zane. Thanks for having me.
Thanks for writing a great book. I thoroughly enjoyed reading it. I like anybody who writes well. But you share some great personal anecdotes along with great research.
In your intro you write:
There has never been a better time to turn your good ideas into great results.
What makes this the best time to turn good ideas into great results?
I think there’s two reasons. The best reason is the fact that the world needs a few good ideas executed right now. We’re obviously not short of a few challenges we need to overcome. You mentioned the economy at the top of the introduction.
But the real reason from an entrepreneurial perspective is that there’s more cash sloshing around right now than there ever has before. Did you know that just the top 100 American companies, multinationals that is, have more than $1 trillion in retained profits overseas alone. And that’s not to say the money they have here in the U.S. as well.
Two reasons.
- The world needs it.
- There’s plenty of money, to get behind the people who have the good ideas, to make them happen.
Excellent. Cash is king and cash flow keeps you king.
Of all the authors I've read since 5th grade when I discovered I'm an avid reader you're the only author to have ever written:
This book is not for everyone. Who should not read this book?
By default then, who should read your book?
Yeah, well, the reason it’s not for everybody is I love these books you pick up these days particularly oriented towards personal development, which I’m obviously a huge fan of, still are talking about coming face to face with your potential and overcoming issues from your past and believe that you have the ability to get things done...where I believe there is a gap in the market is what to do next.
So, let’s assume you’re already confident you can get things done. Let’s assume you’ve got no more unresolved issued that are getting in your way now. And you really want to get out there, take your business ideas, take your social movement idea and really start to execute and get some results from that.
What we want to do is set a clear expectation up front. This book is about tactics and very specific strategies you can execute in the marketplace to start to generate the impact you’re looking to generate. If you’re looking for a pep-up book telling you you’re wonderful this is not that book. This is the book you read after that book.
Excellent. I love that answer.
Your book is less about ideas and more about making those ideas into tangible results. My friend, Erika Andersen, coined the phrase reasonable aspiration or hoped-for future. And she asks:
What is your reasonable aspiration or hoped-for future?
What was yours in writing this book?
I think that there are two.
The first was that I really do sense that there are a lot of people with desire who aren’t taking that next step for risk. Selling the house or the car to get out there and start that company...the sorts of things that entrepreneurs do the world over.
So, one, to see if I could trigger a few more people into taking those necessary risks.
Two, more important, is to make sure those risks pay off.
It obviously could be hit and miss in the entrepreneurial and social-preneurial space. I wanted to make sure that people who were willing to ante up that those risks would pay off with some simple learnings, although quite deep and insightful at parts, that just accelerate their success and would get them through those difficult early times.
What metrics did you look for to measure your progress towards that hoped-for future?
I mean the simplest metric from my perspective is how many books did I sell. But, I don’t think that’s actually the right metric.
Just because someone buys a book it doesn’t mean they actually do anything with the information inside. We generally track how many unsolicited emails, testimonials and comments we get where people don’t just go:
“Hey, Pete, loved your book.”
But they go:
“Not only did I love your book, but I did these 4 things as a result and here’s been the impact.’
And we’ve already started to see that. The book has been released throughout Australia, New Zealand and Asia as well. We’ve had a number of positive messages of things people have done.
So, that’s the metric we use: Unsolicited emails where people actually citing the activity that they have engaged in as a result of having read it.
This is not part of the questions I sent you before the show. But I was thinking it would be wonderful, easy for me to say, if there was a place where people could share their testimonials and their stories of what they did with your book where others could read it. Give tangible inspiration for those people like you said who have the desire but aren’t ready to take a tangible step quite yet. Those personal stories might inspire them over the edge to take that first step.
Yeah, actually that’s not a bad idea. I should probably check with my team and see where we would put those. I know we put slide testimonials up on the web with books. I should probably know answers to such questions shouldn’t I?
You probably got a few things going on.
Yeah, most mornings I wake up with nothing to do; you know how it is.
Why are metrics a sore point for those on the entrepreneurial journey to make it happen?
‘Cause metrics hurt. They’re black and white. There’s no BS; they tell you how it is.
And people resist the metrics. Sometimes you need some level of delusion to keep you moving on. I can’t remember who it was but I once heard a famous quote that said something like:
“Belief is like the drug that gets you through the hard times.”
I think sometimes that metrics can hit a little hard, a little deep, too soon. I think people resist it for that reason.
But I also have a sense that particularly today a lot of entrepreneurs want to do more than just make money. They want to do something that makes an impact. I think metrics sometimes diminish the value of what they hold in what they do. They’re not all measuring it by the personal benefit of what that was.
I think there’s two reasons.
- it’s pretty black and white and tells you how it is.
- it doesn’t necessarily capture the whole story and why you do what you do.
But it certainly does measure the impact you make in the marketplace. And it certainly does measure the metrics the marketplace does use to determine whether or not to engage.
This is one of the key ideas from the book. Too often we get obsessed with our own idea and the value we see in that idea rather than the value the buyer sees in our idea. That’s a key part of packaging we’ll talk about later.
What is the key to knowing the right metric?
It’s actually that same point. The key to know the right metric is knowing what metric the buyer is using to determine any value. Now, one of the limitations of that or the challenge of that is the buyer doesn’t know the value until he or she has been through the experience. If that buyer is using the metric of bottom-line or that buyer is using the metric of bums on seats, humans in the room, or numbers of followers...then that’s the metric; don’t fight it.
You might have all sorts of ancillary values to add which you can later create explicit metrics around. But for now you gotta make sure you can deliver on that metric. I would make sure the buyer’s metric is what you gravitate towards.
Your book lists 5 competencies that drive buyers’ behavior, break through mental barriers and effectively position your offer in the market. What are those 5?
- Packaging
- Positioning
- Influence
- Acceleration
- Reinvention
I’ll give you a very quick snapshot of what each of those things are.
Packaging is taking what’s a nice idea in your mind and communicating it, languaging it, putting it together in such a way that you actually sell it. It’s the transition from the idea to what we call ‘the offer’.
Positioning is then taking that offer and then linking it to a market need. Occasionally that requires convincing the market it needs something it doesn’t know it needs. It’s about making sure you’re taking your supply, which is your offer, and the market, which is the demand and making sure there’s a connection between the two.
Generally what you find is that you are not the only person selling in that space, and the only one with some value in that context which brings you to the 3 competency.
Influence. This is a key and very challenging part of the process. How do you get the buyer across the line. Yeah, you’ve got them interested. Yeah, you’ve got the meeting. How do you get ‘em to write a check.
Acceleration. Once you’ve started to get some penetration into the marketplace then you’ll start leveraging that for a greater financial or social return, whatever that is in your business.
The final step is:
Reinvention. It’s essentially when should you start building the next thing? when should you start riding the next wave? When should you start leveraging your expertise to create newer and bigger opportunities.
Which one is the biggest stumbling block for entrepreneurs?
It actually depends which stage you’re in. Early stage entrepreneurs, those who haven’t got out of the stumbling blocks, then packaging is the biggest. People are far too obsessed with what they want and nowhere near obsessed with what the buyer wants. And some of the ways you overcome that packaging piece is to very early on get very, very narrow. In other words, specialize.
And if you want to know how you get to that method it’s basically adopting what’s known as the Socratic method. Instead of using the question ‘why’, you use the question ‘how’.
I want to start a business consulting.
How? Doing what?
Uh, well, I want to consult to retail companies about driving sales.
How?
Well, I want to help them work their database to better help them leverage their customer’s loyalty.
How?
And you keep asking that question and you find you get narrower and narrower around what’s commonly called “the value proposition”.
That’s the first thing would do to turn around the packaging blockage in the entrepreneurial phase.
The 2nd strategy, and I’m going to list 2, is to talk to buyers as early as you can. There’s no point in asking family and friends whether they like your idea. You need to ask the marketplace whether they like your idea. You very quickly find out that it’s really not all about you, it’s all about them. Do the questioning process around ‘how’. Then test the market as early as you can with real prospects and real buyers.
That’s the early stage. If you want me to, I can tell you about later stages and where they fall down?
I think for those of us who are already on the journey and getting some results from making an impact it’s actually acceleration that becomes the block. acceleration is at that stage where you’re making some sales, raising some money for your charity, but you’re just not fully exploiting the opportunity you have created.
The real issue with acceleration is you get in a comfort zone really quickly or you get in a fear and protect phase. Let me explain those two stages.
You used to have a job making $150,000 a year; you thought you were doing really well. You decided to start your company and things went really, really, well for you and you got positioning right and you got packaging and influencing right, you’re making some sales. Maybe, you’re making a couple hundred grand a year and you’re thinking life is good.
You very quickly say:
"I shouldn’t want more than that. Maybe, I should be happy with what I’ve got."
And you start to hit that kinda cruise-control mode and never push the next level. That’s obviously a very dangerous place to be. That’s a well-trodden territory by a lot of other authors; I don’t spend a lot of time on it.
What I find interesting is the emergence of a risk-base and a risk-aversion in the entrepreneur and the socialpreneur where you stop taking the risks. You stop having the conversations and you stop doing the market risks that got you where you are right now because you’re so scared you’re going to lose what you have created.
I think it’s just crucial for the entrepreneur to not fall into that fear-based mentality. ‘Cause what you begin to do is adopt those very behaviors that limit your success rather than increase your success.
And in the book, we talk a lot about what sort of partnerships you can start to leverage, what mechanisms for getting scale can you start to invest in, how can you leverage existing brand platforms, some really sophisticated but powerful strategies to make sure you get a disproportionate return for the time and effort you put in.
Your listeners know that they gave more to their business, they invested more in their idea in the first 12- 18 months, sometimes 5 - 10 years than they got out. It was disproportionately bad for what they got out. Don’t stop. And don’t get fearful at the very moment when you can tip it over the edge and get that critical mass and get a disproportionate return for your effort.
You talk about ideas being based on something other than money and personal gain. If not money and personal gain, then what are these ideas based on?
Not everyone’s in it for themselves. Quite genuinely I think people have dual motives. From time to time that dual motive might be:
“Look I would feel a certain significance if I was to make a certain contribution.”
But part of that motive is quite a pure motive which is:
“ I really want to make a contribution. “
I had a friend who was a very senior international law enforcement officer who went to Thailand after the tsunami. And obviously he saw the utter devastation that occurred in Asia after that tsunami. Haiti would be a similar example more recently and obviously Japan, even more recently.
And he went there and he could not go back to the life he lived prior. And he said:
“You know what? I’ve gotta start building orphanages. I’ve gotta start building schools for these kids who are now without parents.”
And he has built 3 orphanages, 2 schools, does massive fund-raising every year. He’s really made it happen. And he’s made it happen on a commercial sense but took all the money he made and plowed it into these activities of social good
I want people to realize that making it happen is not just for the selfish person who wants to make money, which by the way is ok as well and it’s certainly part of the strategies we’ll do as well. But it’s also for you who have a much more socially oriented quest who I don’t think is better or worse it’s just different.
Excellent.
One of your keys to success is rejecting acceptance. Who doesn't want acceptance especially if its for our very precious idea? How do we get over this need for acceptance or at least manage it?
You actually hit on the head when you said create a sense of identity with the idea itself. That is a destructive pattern because all of a sudden you never have to put it to a test whether or not the idea has legs. And one of the ways you do that is you keep rolling the idea out in front of people you know and like and like you.
You roll it out at such a level of abstraction that no one can reject it.
You say something like:
“I really want to invest and create a nest egg for my family.”
Well, who’s going to say that’s a dumb idea? No one, right?
Or you say:
“I really want to help the victims in Haiti. I want to build infrastructure.”
Well, um, no one’s going to tell you that’s a dumb idea at that level of abstraction.
We keep rolling our ideas out to people who are going to support us which relates back to your idea that folks reinforce our self-identity.
I hate to be blunt, but that’s really a road to nowhere. Really, that’s a path of zero impact.
You have to attach your identity to the impact you want to make. People don’t judge you by what you want to do. They judge you by what you actually do. They don’t judge you by your intent; they judge you by your impact.
There’s a gentleman who coached me at a company and he said:
“Your own people don’t judge you by if you try to do the right thing. They judge you by the impact of your behavior.”
I think the sooner we raise our standards for the impact we make. So, I have no sympathy for, I have empathy I guess, but I don’t think we should be wallowing in self-identity.
That’s why I said right up front that this book is not for those who are looking for their self-esteem to be stroked. Frankly, the only way you build self-esteem is by getting out there and doing something. Standing in front of the mirror and saying “I love you I love you I love you” will only get you so far.
The first step is to detach yourself from the idea and attach yourself more to the impact, the contribution, the progress that you make.
I have a question that may seem a little out of context but I like the point you were making. You talk about the biggest mistake most of us make in our jobs, our business and even in our relationships is to forget we are participating in an exchange. That means it is two-way traffic.
It’s such an obvious point. I can see it in myself, in other people. But, why’s that such a common mistake. Where do we get off-track from understanding we’re in a marketplace?
Because the marketplace is a scary place. Its that simple.
There are volumes and entire shelves of bookstores dedicated to overcoming the fear and doing it anyway. This book is not about that. Let’s assume you can build a bridge and here’s what you gotta do. This is a strategy book, a tactic book. This is not a PD, how you doing/how you feeling book.
It’s clearly a fear-based thing. Plenty of psychologists can give you some insight into that. When you get into the marketplace, the marketplace doesn’t judge you on your intent. It judges you on the value you bring. Period. Exclamation! Full-stop. Underline. Bold. Moving on....
And, if you don’t want to play in that world then don’t go on that journey.
Sorry if I’m not very soft and squishy around the outside.
No. I’m loving it. It’s music to my ears. I love that quote:
The marketplace doesn’t value you on your intent. It values you on your impact.
I think the sooner we raise our standards for the impact we make. So, I have no sympathy for, I have empathy I guess, but I don’t think we should be wallowing in self-identity.
That’s why I said right up front that this book is not for those who are looking for their self-esteem to be stroked. Frankly, the only way you build self-esteem is by getting out there and doing something. Standing in front of the mirror and saying “I love you I love you I love you” will only get you so far.
The first step is to detach yourself from the idea and attach yourself more to the impact, the contribution, the progress that you make.
I have a question that may seem a little out of context but I like your point you were making. You talk about the biggest mistake most of us make in our jobs, our business and even in our relationships is to forget we are participating in an exchange. That means it is two-way traffic.
It’s such an obvious point. I can see it in myself, in other people. But, why’s that such a common mistake. Where do we get off-track from understanding we’re in a marketplace?
Because the marketplace is a scary place. Its that simple.
There are volumes and entire shelves of bookstores dedicated to overcoming the fear and doing it anyway. This book is not about that. Let’s assume you can build a bridge and here’s what you gotta do. This is a strategy book, a tactic book. This is not a PD, how you doing/how you feeling book.
It’s clearly a fear-based thing. Plenty of psychologists can give you some insight into that. When you get into the marketplace, the marketplace doesn’t judge you on your intent. It judges you on the value you bring. Period. Exclamation! Full-stop. Underline. Bold. Moving on...
And, if you don’t want to play in that world then don’t go on that journey.
Sorry. I’m not very soft and squishy around the outside.
No. I’m loving it. It’s music to my ears. I love that quote:
The marketplace doesn’t value you on your intent. It values you on your impact.
Now, speaking of acceptance, what are 3 most common ways an offer can fail?
Well, the first way is to put it in the marketplace. Right? Because, sometimes, the fear of rejection is much greater than the rejection itself. So, by getting out in the marketplace and getting a few ‘no’s’ you start to realize that wasn’t so bad, that doesn’t hurt so much. and I was still breathing, I made it home, my kids still loved me, my partner was still there. You realize that rejection is just part of that gig.
And, what you start to see is that rejection is just part of the process. You start to see the bits about your offer that people respond to. You start to see their eyes light up. Even though they didn’t buy, they rejected idea overall, you start to get a better idea where that fits, what has resonance with the buyer.
That very act of testing in the marketplace, getting real feedback, is just crucial. In my book, FLIP, we call that action precedes clarity. Sometimes you can get enough analysis to know if your idea is any good. So, you have to just test it.
I think the 2nd thing from a principle perspective is to help you get over this fear of rejection or having an idea that’s too self-centric and not buy-centric enough is to make sure you’re not seduced by what I call ‘CUTE’.
Sometimes we spend too much time on the whiteboard coming out with cute names and really creative brands and sexy tag lines. Nobody gives a toss about any of that stuff. All they care about is the value, right?
I think sometimes we get seduced by cute and we think if we put enough creativity into the idea then that will overcome the fact that no one actually wants it.
NO! NO! NO!
Less time on cute. More time on actually creating stuff people want. it’s that old Seth Godin idea that if you made a better product you’d have to spend less time marketing it because people might actually want it. Spend more time refining the offer in the marketplace than you do trying to come up with really cute ways to put it together. Packaging should not be about cute and creative. Packaging should be about valuing and impact.
I think just those two would be enough when added to the one we already talked about which is:
“Ask the question how, how, how.”
You write that:
Attention is the new battleground for business.
Who's winning? Consumers or businesses?
Well, the consumer is winning the battleground, you know.
One of the principles we emphasize pretty early is that everything’s a market and in every market you’re a seller. And there’s always more sellers than buyers. That’s the nature of a capitalist, free-market, system in America and so many places around the world. It’s that bootstrap, if you can make it happen then good for you. But that means you’ve got competition. And I think you realize that you start to realize that no buyer gets up in the morning with you on their mind. No offense guys. No one wakes up wondering:
“How do I get Billy Smith more of my budget today.”
They are getting up dealing with more emails than they can return, more sales pitches than they want to answer and more problems from their boss than they have solutions.
The only way you’re truly going to get on their mental menu is to break through what we call the ‘mental barrier’. It’s this barrier that they deliberately put by blocking their email address, sometimes they put it up by not answering their phone. You’re just another voice in that crowd we’re trying to drown out.
The principle of getting sharp and getting narrow is such a crucial principle. Attention is the battleground and consumers are winning. ‘Consumers’ just mean buyers. You could be in the B2B space. You’re still facing the same issues.
They’ve got scarce resources and more people vying for those resources. Then, you have to find a way to penetrate, find a way to get through. And getting narrow is crucial.
But the next step is the whole step of what competency is about which is about positioning. Once you get narrow on the offer how do you start to language that offer. How do you pick a marketplace to really sell that offer where it really powerfully aligns with something people are waking up in the morning thinking about.
If the buyer wakes up and is thinking about “how do I get more customers myself” and your idea can talk directly to that idea, well now you’re going to get a meeting.
If they’re waking up in the morning wondering about ‘how do I retain more staff’? and your idea addresses that need and you’re narrow then all of a sudden they’ll take that need because anyone who has a solution for this problem then I’m going to talk to.
Someone’s always trying to sell us something and we’re all, all, selling something. We’re on the back side of that of that rejection barrier. The key to getting through that is getting narrow.
Number two is positioning your offer with an already recognized need.
Or three, getting pretty strategic which takes a lot of time and effort and actually generating a market need where they don’t know they already have one that aligns with your offer.
Let’s talk about Chapter 9: The Buyer. You and others report that 90% or more of our decisions are ruled and made by our emotions. And these emotions are colored in part by 4 over-arching drives. What are those 4?
If it’s alright, I’m going to answer that second.
First thing is just to address this concept of 90%. Most of the research shows that in the anatomy of a decision two parts of the brain light up before the rational processing part. In the processing, quite often at a deep level we have already made our decision before looking for a reason to justify our acceptance or rejection of that decision. That doesn’t mean people don’t make rational choices; they actually do. It just means there’s a much greater emphasis on the non-rationally, emotional, than we previously thought.
And the way you wield rational things like how much does it cost, how long does it take, and how does it compare on features and benefits to the competition...What it means is you must wield that with alignment in the emotional decision-making.
Think about executive coaching. It’s the fastest growing professional services segment in the world, right now. It’s getting real traction particularly in big companies. And the essence, what you’re really selling, is some sort of therapy. You’re helping them overcome personal issues to enhance their performance. That’s basically what it is, aka, ‘Therapy.’
When you’re selling in that market, you can’t go and say ‘therapy’. You have to call it ‘executive coaching’ because that’s much more socially acceptable. The packaging of th service as ‘executive coaching’ appeals to that rational need to justify what they want in a setting of a corporation. But in an emotional level what you’re really doing is:
- Number one: helping someone manage their poor performance which is really getting their team down and is becoming a serious issue.
- Number two: helping that person you’re coaching overcome deep seated issues with their work or how they see themselves with their fear of change and all the sorts of things that go with that pandora’s box of coaching.
This emotional piece and not being able to call it what it is has to then be supported with great names and key service deliverables and service level agreements and all the sorts of rational things that companies need to engage. But you have to understand that each of those tangible things, each of those emotional things, must align with the deeper emotion which is
‘HELP. Please.’
It’s not that people don’t make rational decisions. It’s just that it’s a very intricate and complex interplay between emotions and things that sit just below conscious thinking and things that sit above.
We spend a good 80 pages in the book not only understanding what that is and how that plays out, but actually outlining dozens of ideas and strategies for how you can basically service the interplay.
You reference in your question a key part of that content. And it’s a concept of what sits deep in the human psyche as an inseparable, constantly-there, omnipresent, set of needs that every buyer, everywhere on earth, has.
The model we adopted, and by the way there are dozens of models, the model we chose to adopt was one by Paul Lawrence out of Harvard who is an evolutionary biologist who really understands the development of the human mind throughout history. He has a very simple approach. There are 4 drives that are always, always, active in every human circumstance when they are buying. These 4 drives are:
Drive to Acquire. It’s the drive to get more out of life. It’s the drive to get more social standing, get more physical goods, to get more money. It comes from this idea that he who has the most, wins, when everything runs out. Some people don’t agree with it. Some people have a faith-based opposition.
Drive to Bond. It’s this concept that we need to connect deeply on an emotional level with other people emotionally. I think that our understanding of this drive to bond extends beyond people to now include community groups. And, to brands, as well.
If you think about the success of the Harley-Davidson Owners Group, also known as HOG, you start to see that brands and companies selling products can build deep communities around their product that appeals to people’s drive to bond.
Church by the way, and if you think about the really fast growth of particularly evangelical Christian churches, the ones that bring a lot more engagement, emotion and entertainment, a lot more contemporary perspectives to faith and the ability to attract young believers to their congregation, I mean you’re talking about a drive to bond at a very deep level.
And, at that level you’re starting to look at the 3rd driver. And we call that driver...
Drive to Comprehend. Paul Lawrence’s research over the years has used a couple of different labels. It’s this concept that every human is always seeking answers, answers to the way things are. It’s not just curiosity; it’s a deep yearning for purpose. If you think about some of those faith-based organizations, they’re not just giving them a bond, but they’re giving them answers to these deep questions they have about their life and their time on the planet.
Drive to Defend. This often works in conflict to the first drive which is the Drive to Acquire. We talked about this when you asked me the question “What is the biggest mistake entrepreneurs make?” and I said acceleration is the biggest area of need for the later-stage entrepreneur. Once they’ve built things that they aka have acquired it’s very easy to slip into a risk-aversion and start to protect that. That is the drive to defend the bonds we have made or the understandings and beliefs we have established in our Drive to Comprehend. It’s why people defend the status quo. It’s why people will do anything to protect their family. We are defending that which is ours.
These are the 4 needs based on Paul Lawrence’s research that we have taken to and used to apply the buying situation on how to do you get people to part with their time, energy and money to support your cause or your product?
I’m going to follow-up on a question you’ve probably already answered. But your answers are so good I’d like to drill into them, if you don’t mind.
Which of these 4 drivers hold the greatest opportunity for those businesses seeking sustainability?
It really is all 4 or any one of the 4, to be honest with you. If you can build a product that genuinely appeals to one of those 4 drives and more importantly as the seller of that product and the position in the market of that offer, if you can get that offer really alight inside the buyer at a rational, but more importantly at an emotional level that if they buy this, that if they come to that, that if they support you, if they travel to...whatever it is your offers is asking them to do...if it can tap into anyone of these 4 then you are onto gold. But if you can tap into multiple at the same time, man, now you’re talking, right!
No one takes precedence. For instance, when the real estate market was exploding, the drive to acquire and the drive to defend were running rampant, they were on fire. People were getting anything that could help them build their wealth and improve their property portfolio, that’s the drive to acquire. Simultaneously, they’re also trying to protect that which they have. the security camera business was exploding at that time. You still see a spot in the sale of such things. You see big spike when things turn ugly and people go into a cocoon phase and they really start to protect things they have.
Brand names. You wouldn’t believe. Have you seen the numbers? The increase in sales over the last 12 months of high-end, luxury, goods has been something to behold. We’re talking high double-digit growth in brands like Louis-Vitton and Burberry and Coach. These guys are on fire.
We’re in the middle of the worst recession in 90 years and people are buying these things. And you’re asking ‘Why’. Obviously it’s a statement about who they are and the group they belong to. It’s got something to do with the drive to bond. It’s probably got something to do with how they comprehend their world. And it’s probably got something to do with acquisition.
It’s no one quite honestly. But, if you’re a smart entrepreneur you’ll use these as filters and you’ll try to appeal to as many of them in your positioning and your influence stages of going to market as you possibly can.
A couple of weeks ago we had Brian Brim, a co-author of Strengths-Based Selling, on the show. He had a formula for defining Strengths. You have a formula for defining Trust. What’s that formula?
Yeah, so let me be upfront about this. This formula is basically, there’s plenty of versions of this Trust formula getting around. They pretty much kinda tap into the same concepts. So, I don’t want to claim 100% originality here. Because, this is just my interpretation of the formulas out there and the way my buyers have behaved out there.
Trust = credibility + authenticity / self-interest.
And what that basically means is:
- does the buyer believe you are credible, competent and able to deliver on what you say you can deliver.
- are you authentic? Do they feel a sincerity? Not only can you do it, but do they think you’re willing to do it. Are you of that kind of character?
- divide by your self-interest. If the buyer thinks it’s all about you want, then they start to trust you less and less.
The reason that’s such an issue or so important in the buying decision is that people really want to feel like they can trust you, not just get it done. They trust you to have their best interest at heart. And when you start trying to influence someone’s decision then trust is a big part of that equation.
Brands tend to have the self-interest common denominator pretty strong. That’s why we don’t wake up thinking about them. How have you seen brands bring more credibility and authenticity to improve their ratio over self-interest?
I think transparency is actually the strategy that’s having the most traction right now. The reason people are so hot on social media and web 2.0 is that forum, that environment, creates a dialogue with brands. That dialogue creates creates transparency. They fell like you are open and honest. They fell like they are getting closer into your world.
One of the things that’s interesting about that is that you don’t have to get it right every time. You just have to be honest and upfront about it every time. In fact, many brands have found that negative situations, or customer problems, have in fact become some of the most powerful ways that they build trust with their clients.
I had a personal experience with this recently. We manage some pretty big programs for some of the most powerful brands in the world. So, we are quite literally their public face in a very big way. And that means our behavior reflects directly on them. So, we treat them with the utmost respect that it obviously deserves.
We recently the sites of one of our clients was hacked. And I mean properly hacked. It was coming in from all sorts of foreign paraphernalia about things that were not really appropriate for our client’s brand. And we were distraught about that. The speed and response, it took us 6 minutes to take that site down and 5 minutes to restore that site with pristine code to replace that site.
Let’s be honest: the client was not too please about the fact that their site was defaced in the first place. But it was the speed of our response and our ability to showhow many people visited that site during the time it was down, the execution of our 6-point execution plan to turn it around, and most recently the mechanisms we put in place to make sure it didn’t happen.
Let’s be honest: we screwed up, right. It was our willingness to admit that and more importantly the expediency and the thoroughness with which we addressed the problem that I now believe we are now in position of even greater trust than we were in before as a result of the mistake. We were transparent about what happened. But we were also prepared to deal with the mistake when it came up.
You hear stories about companies like Zappos that revel when customer situations come up. That’s the moment of truth.
Not all brands should leverage social media to do that; some should, some shouldn’t. But just this kind of filter of transparency is really a great strategy of getting that done.
I love the story and the reminder that a little stress on the relationship can make it stronger as long as you’re honest and correct it immediately. That was the key I was getting from your story. You fixed it first. Then you came back and talked about how to make it stronger, better, moving forward.
Now. You list 6 more ways brands can improve that ratio of credibility and authenticity to a brand’s self-interest.
Number 7, I love the most. And that is pitch less, pull more. Can you give us an example of a brand who made that transition from pitching less to pulling more?
Yeah, you know, it’s my favorite as well.
I like the concept of position, persistence and passion at the top of that list as well because of some of the science that we unpack in making that happen in understanding how the brain works when either deciding to believe or not to believe.
I like “Pitch less, pull more”. It’s actually the hardest to pull off. It takes extreme courage for you to not try and push your offer on to somebody and trust that they will come to you. That is a super-courageous step to take.
My favorite example is a construction company in California called DPR Construction. Let’s be clear. This is big construction company. They do extremely sophisticated projects. They involve multiple banks, funders and contractors. Very complex projects.
This business is traditionally built on RFP, request for proposal. The clients says “I want to get this building built. I want to get 3-5 quotes. And you put time, money and energy for the work and you may not get it. It’s very expensive business because you can spend $20 - 425 million just pitching for a $600-$700 million project. You can spend a lot of cash and then not have it work.
And DBR Construction felt that it was not only a very bad use of resources but it created the wrong dynamic. It created not a partnership but a desire for the client to basically outsource the responsibility for everything to the contractor, to the construction company.
And at the end of the day the contractor got blamed for everything. There was not a good spirit of collaboration. People weren’t in partnership even though they all had a vested interest in their success.
So, this is what DBR did. They started to refuse in certain circumstances to put a proposal in in a competitive setting.
So, just imagine you have half-a-billion dollars you want to spend and you’re asking people if they want some of that work. Every company is clamoring over this work, climbing over each other, trying to take you out to dinner, sucking up to put their proposal in. And one company says:
“You know what. We really want to do this job. But we have absolutely no interest in following your process. We think it’s dysfunctional and we think it destroys the value for you and it destroys value for us. If you decide you want to partner with someone call us up and we’ll have a conversation. If not, good luck with your project.”
The first response with clients who have a half-a-billion dollars is:
“What arrogance! Who are they to think that they can get away with that. What gall of that construction company!”
But then your mind starts to get messed with and you start to think:
“Wow! If they’re that good that they can just flat-out say ‘no’ then maybe that’s who we want to do business with and maybe they’re right; maybe this industry is dysfunctional.”
And all of a sudden this willingness to not play the game the same way had clients starting to come back and say:
“Tell us about this approach.”
And all of a sudden you’re through the mental barrier. All of a sudden you have a certain curiosity of the buyer. And they proceed to unpack that they believe in shared values, that they believe in risk, that they believe in working together, not going for the cheapest price but going for the best outcome. Which, by the way, is a better way of doing business.
Having the courage to fight back against that traction creates a pull towards the business and has people going
“Wow. Maybe I should come to you.”
The other example, on a much smaller scale, would be Gary Vaynerchuk. You know he has a wine blog, the retail wine shop and he’s created a business talking about simple matchings of affordable wine and good food. And then he’s now a best-selling author, international speaker.
He did the same thing with wine and blogs.
So, there’s a big example and a little example.
Speaking of pitching what’s the default setting in our buyer’s mind?
Oh, it’s 'no'. The default setting is ‘no’.
We can’t just say ‘yes’ to everything that’s banging down our door.
In almost every buyer, except when you’re in that pull situation instead of the push situation, when you are going to a buyer when you are reaching out to a buyer which for many of us we actually have to do far more than we would like, when you’re in that situation the default answer is flat-out ‘no’.
You’re cold-calling, you’re giving me a pitch...’convince me’. And you can actually see it in their body language. And this is why it’s so important to get narrow, understand that buyer’s needs and number three, more importantly, when you’re in that buying situation you kinda get a sense of the identity of that particular buyer and what do you think their unwritten motivations are, what do you think their unconscious biases are?
If you want to break this dynamic of ‘prove something to me, monkey boy’, then you really have to start to kinda break through that default setting.
- Understand their personal motivations.
- Understand the conscious and unconscious buying dynamics which is positioning in and around need.
- The packaging piece which we talked about is all about getting narrow.
What are the three easy’s we have to maintain in order to overcome that default setting?
It depends on what stage you’re in.
If you’re in the default position to know early, you have to be thinking about things that are easy to support. You have to give people the justifications that they need to the people who determine if they’re allowed to spend the money on it.
For instance, even when you’re talking to a senior executive in a business there’s a pretty good chance she or he has another person they have to justify the decisions to. So, making sure your product solution or service is easy for them to support and justify when they get to their client and boss is crucial.
We once did a project for a major server company. What we did was, it was the beginning of the global financial crisis and no one was buying servers. We were trying to figure out why no one was buying. We did a bit of research. Most of the procurement people in IT were scared of losing their job. And they certainly didn’t want to bring attention to themselves by spending huge amount of money on capital equipment.
So, we put a promotion in place that basically promised a hundred percent money back for any reason if they decided in the first nine months that they needed to free up the capital or they wished they hadn’t spent their money or their server wasn’t working.
We gave them a nine month guarantee. They had to pay up front cause we weren’t going to be their banker.
What happened?
All of sudden sales started climbing again. Because the real reason that people weren’t buying wasn’t that they didn’t need the equipment. It was that they were lacking justification for spending the money now when their boss asked them why didn’t you wait a few months. And as soon we gave them the 9 month guarantee all of sudden their bosses started screaming:
‘What are you doing spending money now...?’
Then they could say:
‘No, no, no. We get our money back if we decide don’t like it, or we need to free the cash up.... they’ll come back and take the server back.’
We know. No one rips a server out once they’ve stuck in the wall. But what we were doing was making it easy to justify, easy to support, for this person.
You cannot belive how often this happens to making it easy to buying a product. You're talking to small businesses who don’t accept American Express and because they don’t want to spend the 2.2%.
Oh, my gosh. Someone wants to give you money and you make it difficult? You see it with this ecommerce retailers who make you go through 6 steps to give you money. Are you kidding me?
If someone wants to give you money then get out of their way. It’s about simplifying the purchasing process and making it easier to buy.
And the third one is understanding how your product integrates into that person’s world. One of the reasons, by the way, and it’s much more common than people realize that people choose to say ‘no’ is not because they think your product is no good or your product might solve some problems. It’s because there’s so much other stuff going on in their world that they’re worried that this next piece of change will disrupt the flow and give them more things to think about. And sometimes making your product, making your service, making your offer, easy to integrate is crucial. How could you make it easy to own this thing?
For example, I use a pen that records my briefings and preparations for some of the work I do. And the other day I wanted to upgrade my pen. I went and got the pen and I did the upgrade and it deleted all my old files because I’m using a new version. I’m going:
“Are you kidding me? How stupid could this company be by spending more money and upgrading it actually becomes a really negative experience for me. ”
So, easy to justify, easy to buy, and then easy to integrate into our lives.
We have reached the imagination moment in our show. Your book is about turning ideas into great results. So this next question should be easy for you to answer. Let's imagine President Obama is calling Jessica Krakowski right now as he listens to the show. He wants to set up a meet with you in the Oval Office. The VP will be there. He leaves Jessica with this message:
Peter. Loved your book. Loved hearing your ideas. Would you come to the WH and talk about how to make it happen with our economy? In particular, what are three things we can do right now to make it, that's full employment, happen?
What would you tell him?
Thanks. That’s a really simple question. There are nobel laureates trying to answer that question successfully, much less me.
Look. I’d have a couple of pieces of advice.
Number one: Pick your battles. What are the areas where you’re going to have the longest impact. I’m Australian; I don’t get to vote. I’m on neither side of the political spectrum. But if you look at the history of the US, it’s when they invested in infrastructure for the next 20 years that they had the greatest success. Now. Infrastructure is different depending on your era. When Eisenhower talked about it he was talking about freeways. When it was 20 years ago you were talking about building technology infrastructure and the web.
The big question I would ask is where will the world be in the next 20 years. And let’s make our investments there. It might not get us to full employment by the next election cycle; but that’s the nature of the beast. But it may well leave this country with the foundation we need to be successful.
I travel the world. I work in 25 different countries, a lot them in Asia, a lot of them in Europe. It’s funny to hear the anti-China rhetoric, at the moment. The way to beat China is not to protect us, not to build walls or shut down trade. The way to make sure we dominate the world’s economy is to:
‘Be what’s next.’
Just do the next big thing better than anybody else. We should stop freaking out about the trade issues and things like that and instead just start innovating.
So, that would be my first piece of advice. What’s the infrastructure that’s needed in the next 20 years and let’s invest in that because that wil lcreate the innovations that will let us be successful.
Number two: You’ve got to allow the big companies who now have most of their money and most of their training overseas, the big companies don’t make most of their money in America, they make it overseas. End of story.
Let’s stop thinking that the world stops at the Pacific and the Atlantic on either side of the US. And let’s see if we can allow some of these companies to repatriot some of those profits from around the world. Many of these companies are in very heated debates with the government, it’s the IRS really, to bring back large sums of money.
Right now, there’s a trillion dollars in international retained profits right now. Could you imagine if those companies could bring that money back at a much more appropriate tax rate when compared to the rest of the world.
I think they could create jobs, make bigger investments locally in the American economy. All this talk about middle-class tax rates and rich tax rates, the big money is in the big end of town.
That would be my two bits of advice. I don’t know what my third one is.
Two is great. I love those two options.
Readers are leaders. Jim Rohn says that, I just quote him. You're a leader. What are you reading these days?
I’ve given up kinda reading the really general books. I’m much more into reading the very deep, very narrow, highly-researched pieces of work.
The best book I‘ve read lately is a book called Where Good Ideas Come From. It deals with a fascinating exploration of how idea generation, like rally breakthrough innovations, really mimics evolution in nature.
Even though my world is about once you’ve got a good idea, a crucial part of my work is helping people come up with ideas as well.
I’m reading a lot of stuff about innovation and execution.
I really do believe it’s not about talking a big game; it’s about execution and getting things done. I’m reading anything that helps companies develop cultures, processes, systems that create a culture of execution.
For me now it’s really about tactics and how to get things done.
Thank you very much for your time and your great book. We’ve come to the wrapup point of the show. I always have this point on my list of questions, but I never prepare for it because I never want to end the show.
Very rarely do I grab a guest’s book during their show in order to find more questions to ask. But I found myself flipping through the pages to find more questions to ask.
Thank you for that.
What’s the last quote you’d leave our listeners for making it happen?
"The world doesn’t need new ideas. It needs people who know how to execute on ideas."
That’s the governing premise on the whole book.
If you’re listening to the show, you have the ability to execute, to make it happen. You just need to understand the strategies that we lay out. Basically, it’s the 5 core competencies. If you get that right you can truly get the return on the time, money, and energy you are putting into these things.
"The world doesn’t need your idea. It needs your ability to execute."
Where can we find you on the world wide web?
Two sites.
Thank you!