I asked this question on LinkedIn last week.
Is social media the cause of social change or does it result from changes in society?
Here are the answers from LinkedIn's community.
Rob Duncan
☆ Innovation catalyst ☆ Director of commercialization & innovation group. Keynote speaker, author, consultant, educ
- Director, Applied Research Liaison Office at British Columbia Institute of Technology (BCIT)
- CEO, Great Capes Consulting.
Hi Zane,
I'd say it's a bit of both. Online social networks provide an enabling function that allows more widespead and efficient networks to take shape. In turn, that changes behavior because more people see what a vast and distributed network is capable of in terms of business leads, collaborative innovation and idea-sharing (LinkedIn Q&A being a good example of this).
Social networks and the theory behind them are not new at all. Researchers like Granovetter have been doing work around the strength of weak ties and the value of social networks for decades. The difference is that we now have the cheap technology to turn theory into practice.
This reminds me of the development of database marketing. It was always possible through the centuries for the corner grocer to remember you, your shopping preferences, your family's names, and even their birthdays. When computing power got strong and cheap enough, it became possible to do this on a vast and distributed scale. Another example of a cheap and powerful technology that enabled a long-standing behavior.
********************************************************
Wink Game
Sales at Wink Game LLC/ ACN/ Oxygenetix
http://www.myspace.com/winkgamellc
Yes.
Links: http://www.clearchannel.com
*******************************************************
Rick Sharrard
I level the legal playing field when somone is accidentally injured
Owner, Sharrard Law
Hi Zane,
So which came first, the chatroom or the blackberry?
But seriously, I believe that people long to be connected and to communicate. As each new technological innovation in communication (mail, telegraph, telephone, radio, cell phone, email, message board, chat room, text message, twitter, etc) leads to use of and evolution of that technology to form new and faster ways to communicate.
Social networking and use of social media is the modern equivalent of the friday night poker game, or CEO's meeting at the athletic club, or getting together for coffee at the town cafe. People still do these things, of course, but now they can do them day or night, with people from all over the world.
The technology fills the need to be in relationship; the ease with which global relationships now occur will change society...and those changes will drive the next innovations which are on the horizon.
My 2 cents.
************************************************
Jacques Vilar
Business Solutions Manager - Capital Markets at JPMorgan Chase (formerly WaMu)
Business Solutions Manager at JPMorgan Chase
Jacques Vilar suggests this expert on this topic:
* Jordan Mitchell
***********************************************
Mathew Best
Owner, Best Solutions, Entrepreneurial Coach (Sole Proprietorship)
http://www.somedayisland.com/
http://eadd.wordpress.com/
Social networking is merely the tool. It certainly assists in social change - maybe by the speed at which it happens, but I can see how it would be the cause of social change. The idea for change comes first. This seems similar to asking if money if the cause of greed. Money is neither good nor bad, it is merely a tool.
*********************************************
John Cass
Director of Marketing at ideaLaunch
Blog: PR Communications
Without the technology, you would not have the ability to come together in groups and discuss, once people have the ability to create content, comment and connect very easily using social media it become easier to affect social change. So I'd say social change that occurs because of social media is the effect from those changes in society. Though we have to understand the level of change may be greater, or even wouldn't have happened without social change. In a way it is both.
*********************************************
Josh Chernin
General Manager at Web Industries; Itinerant Writer; and Decent Little League Coach
Hi Zane,
The same question has often been posed about one-way media such as TV. I think it is both--SM reflects what is going on, but can cause change too. It depends on the creativity and originality of the content provider.
Josh.
********************************************
Gianluigi Cuccureddu
Web Marketing Strategist ★ Consultant @ Traffic4u
Hi Zane,
I'd say that it is neither.
Social Media is an effect by technological possibilities and developments.
The fundamentals/roots of social media (engagement/participation/communication) is rooted in the human being, nothing more, nothing less.
Best regards,
Gianluigi Cuccureddu
******************************************
Thanks, all.
It is the classic chicken or egg, chatroom or blackberry ( excellent contemporary excellent, Rick!), question.
It's fascinating for me to watch social media serve as an accelerant (as Steve MacGill, CEO of Peersight Online, described social media) to the speed of social change. And at the same time be driven by that change to itself adapt to the needs of the community and users and their vision of possibilities as they're awakening to them. The potential for wondrous innovations and solutions personalized for our needs and dreams only rises as we find more ways to get together, digitally or virtually for the friday night poker game, or CEO's meeting at the athletic club, or getting together for coffee at the town cafe...any time we want with anyone around the world when they want when we share common dreams and resources to assist in reaching those dreams.
And as always, thanks to Susan Poirier, CEO of Ace Concierge, for her excellent work putting all this together.
This is the 2nd in an ongoing series of blog posts that result from crowdsourcing the community at LinkedIn. The first blog post in this series was Social Media: Would you recommend it?
Note: The original question for this blog post was edited here for clarity. Thank everyone at LinkedIn for getting past my clumsy phrasing of the original question.